Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:54

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
PS5 shooter goes from 5 players to bestseller after devs defend game - Polygon
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Asian Stocks Start Cautious, Dollar Holds Drop: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What are the most shocking facts about the Bollywood industry?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Is T-Mobile secretly recording your phone's screen? How to check and turn it off - ZDNET
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
4 ways women are physically stronger than men - The Washington Post
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Climate Disasters Hit the Brain Before Babies Are Even Born, Study Suggests - Gizmodo
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.